Governance of the UN Carbon Department

Innovative Governance: The Architecture of Impartiality and Efficiency

To manage a financial mechanism of such scale and importance, an ordinary governance structure would not suffice. Large international organizations are often criticized for their slowness, bureaucracy, and vulnerability to political pressures—debilitating weaknesses for managing a dynamic global tax. That is why the project proposes a radically new governance architecture, designed to be legitimate, impartial, agile, and effective. This model is a preemptive solution to the political failures that have hindered many international initiatives in the past.

The Imperative of Financial Autonomy: The Lesson from UNITAID

The pillar of this new architecture is total financial autonomy. The central proposal is the creation of a new specialized department within the United Nations, but with a defining feature: it will be entirely funded by the revenues from the FTT itself, not by the voluntary or statutory contributions of member states.  

This autonomy is the keystone of the system's impartiality and efficiency. It frees the department from national budget cycles, annual political negotiations over funding, and the pressure that some states might exert by threatening to withhold their contributions. The department can thus act exclusively based on its environmental mission and scientific data, without fear of financial reprisal.  

This model is not a mere utopia. It is directly inspired by the success of UNITAID, an agency hosted by the WHO that is largely financed by an international tax on airline tickets. UNITAID has demonstrated for years the operational viability and effectiveness of a UN agency managing funds from an international tax. Its financial independence has allowed it to play a leading role and act quickly in the fight against major pandemics. By adopting this model, the Carbon Department can avoid the pitfalls of financial dependence that paralyze so many other multilateral efforts.

Waves crashing against rocks on the ocean coast during sunset with a cloudy sky.

A Hybrid and Stratified Governance Architecture

To balance the need for political legitimacy (which comes from member states) with the need for operational agility (which comes from technical expertise), the project proposes a three-tiered stratified governance structure. This separation of powers is designed so that rapid, technical decisions are not bogged down in political debates, while ensuring that overall strategic direction remains under the democratic control of nations.

The Strategic Oversight Body (Political Level)

This would be the highest echelon of governance, ensuring the system's political legitimacy and its alignment with the objectives of the United Nations.

Composition: Representatives of member states, with mechanisms guaranteeing fair geographical and economic representation. It is fundamental that developing countries have a strong and equitable voice to ensure global legitimacy.

A humpback whale breaching out of the ocean with part of its body and pectoral fin visible above the water.

Decision-Making: For substantive issues, a high qualified majority (e.g., two-thirds) would be required. To avoid gridlock, "hybrid voting" mechanisms (such as weighted votes or mediation processes) would be used, an innovative approach inspired by climate negotiations to reconcile divergent interests without paralyzing action.

The Operational Governance Council (Technical Level)

Underwater coral reef with various coral formations and small fish swimming around.

Role: This body does not handle day-to-day management. Its role is strategic: it defines broad policy directions, approves the principles of fund allocation, validates major mandate adjustments, and, above all, sets the FTT rates, ideally via a dynamic formula to reduce politicization.

This is the executive and technical engine of the department, designed for agility and evidence-based decision-making.  

  • Composition: Only world-renowned technical experts, recognized for their competence in finance, climate science, environmental economics, AI, and blockchain, as well as national representatives designated specifically for their technical expertise. 

  • Role: This council is responsible for all operational management: supervising tax collection, developing and maintaining the Carbon Calculator, defining technical measurement and verification protocols, and deciding on the allocation of funds to specific projects, respecting the strategic criteria set by the oversight body.

  • Decision-Making: Decisions are made quickly, based on scientific and technical expertise, to allow the system to adapt in real time to market developments and environmental needs.

The Network of National Satellite Offices (Local Level)

This network is the essential bridge between the global level and the reality on the ground. Liaison offices would be established in key countries to ensure smooth and adapted implementation.

  • Role: These offices act as the "eyes, ears, and mouth" of the organization. They coordinate with national regulators, stock exchanges, and local stakeholders. They adapt global protocols to the legal and technical contexts of each country, offer technical assistance, conduct awareness campaigns, and supervise funded projects on the ground. A crucial role is to guarantee the confidentiality of corporate data by hosting it locally, an essential measure to allay sovereignty concerns and win the trust of national actors.

Volcanic eruption on a coastline with lava flowing into the ocean, emitting smoke and ash.

Efficiency and Financial Viability: An Exceptional Return

Effective governance must also be financially efficient. Detailed cost estimates for the project reveal a model of remarkable administrative profitability.  

Initial setup costs, including fitting out the New York headquarters, establishing 100 satellite offices, and the complex development of the Carbon Calculator and its technological infrastructure, are estimated at approximately $6.35 million.  

Annual operating costs, covering the salaries of a highly qualified staff, rents, technological maintenance, cybersecurity, and carbon neutrality initiatives for the entire global network, are estimated at around $110 million.  

The most striking point is the comparison of this cost to the revenue potential. These annual operating expenses of $110 million represent a tiny fraction—approximately 0.017%—of the FTT's annual revenue potential, estimated at $650 billion. This disproportion demonstrates exceptional administrative efficiency and an extraordinarily high return on investment for financing a global public good. It is a powerful argument to justify the investment, showing that the project is not only ambitious but also financially viable and well-managed.

A scenic view of the ocean with large rocks in the water, a rugged coastline with cliffs covered in trees, and a warm, golden sunset sky.

In summary, the governance of the Carbon Department is designed to combine political legitimacy with technical agility through a three-tiered structure.

  • A Strategic Oversight Body, composed of member states, defines the policy vision.

  • An Operational Governance Council, bringing together technical experts, ensures daily management and operational efficiency.

  • A Network of National Satellite Offices guarantees concrete and coordinated implementation on the ground, in close alignment with local realities.

    This balance ensures that decisions are simultaneously democratic, expert-driven, and pragmatic.